Many providers are familiar with compliance in a health care context. They know to make agreements compliant with the Stark Law and the Anti-Kickback Statute, for instance. But the keys to a good compliance system (policies and procedures, designation of a compliance officer/committee, training and education, communication, ethics and culture, top-down compliance, enforcement, auditing and …
Pumping the Brakes: Amendments to Michigan’s No-Fault Act and the Effect on Health Care Providers
This article was originally published on February 6, 2020. It has been revised to include additional guidance provided by the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services (“DIFS”). In 2019, Michigan enacted amendments to the No-Fault Act (the “Act”), MCL 500.3101 et seq., that will affect the way health care practitioners provide services and are …
Between Absolute and Amorphous: The Draft Guidelines on Vertical Mergers: Commentary on the Draft 2020 Guidelines
Businesses at different levels in the supply chain of a product choose to merge (“vertical mergers,” compared with “horizontal mergers” where business at the same level in the supply chain merge) for a variety of reasons, many of which can be beneficial to competition and/or consumers. Vertical mergers can lead to efficiencies in supply chains, …
HHS’s Proposed Modification to the Personal Services Safe Harbor Under the Anti-Kickback Statute
On October 9, 2019, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) released newly proposed modifications to the safe harbor provisions for the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute. Among other proposals, HHS is proposing three substantive changes to the personal services safe harbor. Section 1128B(b) of the Social Security Act (commonly referred to as the “Anti-Kickback …